Sin duda…desoladora.
Creo que es una película valiente, sincera, basada en una novela brillante y magistral en la forma de transmitir la ceguera al público.
Creo que es una película valiente, sincera, basada en una novela brillante y magistral en la forma de transmitir la ceguera al público.
Entré en la sala, without knowing it was going to see, just xq had gotten tickets and was a good excuse to make pellets. We missed the entrance of actors in the movie, but rewards cm saw my favorite actor tail d n x lo q popcorn ... I was really impressed with the story that exposed us there. Before
, director, writer and film actor Chicano said a few words and the latter asked for some "irony" to his character, and now understand why.
you get into the story, bit by bit, you're experiencing the phenomenon of blindness, step by step, like the protagonists, with a total disregard d what will become of you What will become of them.
The characters are wonderful, assembly, visual way to convey the effect of blindness is fascinating, but is devastating to see how it is creating a new society within the center q, n n once d based solidarity, and q all are experiencing the same problem, it becomes the law of the strongest and will degenerate to points unknown heights. Honestly, it seemed to me the hardest of the whole movie, the lack of faith in man and the goodness of people.
The scene hurt me most was one in which people have to give up their jewelry, discussed with the friend she was, she did not understand, but to me they were giving up items precious, their memories, their families, their loved ones. These objects were symbols dq had a life beyond these four walls d and q people they wanted and were waiting outside. I think that sometimes you keep small items, we uphold and drop you into madness.
There are moments in the film, in which it is difficult to know what role is harder, if the blind do not see, or the woman who sees and understands the horror of what is happening there.
Just one more thing. Throughout the viewing, not knowing what would happen, how it would end like crazy. But here, too close, they solve it. I would have finished film in the scene where the group walks toward the house of the Doctor. For me, this ending was perfect, did not need more.
, director, writer and film actor Chicano said a few words and the latter asked for some "irony" to his character, and now understand why.
you get into the story, bit by bit, you're experiencing the phenomenon of blindness, step by step, like the protagonists, with a total disregard d what will become of you What will become of them.
The characters are wonderful, assembly, visual way to convey the effect of blindness is fascinating, but is devastating to see how it is creating a new society within the center q, n n once d based solidarity, and q all are experiencing the same problem, it becomes the law of the strongest and will degenerate to points unknown heights. Honestly, it seemed to me the hardest of the whole movie, the lack of faith in man and the goodness of people.
The scene hurt me most was one in which people have to give up their jewelry, discussed with the friend she was, she did not understand, but to me they were giving up items precious, their memories, their families, their loved ones. These objects were symbols dq had a life beyond these four walls d and q people they wanted and were waiting outside. I think that sometimes you keep small items, we uphold and drop you into madness.
There are moments in the film, in which it is difficult to know what role is harder, if the blind do not see, or the woman who sees and understands the horror of what is happening there.
Just one more thing. Throughout the viewing, not knowing what would happen, how it would end like crazy. But here, too close, they solve it. I would have finished film in the scene where the group walks toward the house of the Doctor. For me, this ending was perfect, did not need more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment